• Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Touche…

      Pour one out for project Ara, everyone… And the hundreds of other companies that had a bright future before Google bought and destroyed them.

        • Hazzard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Gotta be Google Play Music I’m still bitter about. YouTube music doesn’t hold a candle to it, and I’ve never quite been as happy with Spotify or Apple Music. Getting YT Premium with a good music service was great too, but they shot themselves in the foot.

          And there’s was just… no reason for it. They even delayed its death when they realized how crap YT Music was, and then later just… decided to do it anyways.

  • macrocephalic@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t really get what the hate was for Google+, it was better than the alternative/competitor at the time (Facebook)

    • crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It was definitely much better than Facebook at the time. Especially the concept of circles that they implemented.

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google wasn’t comfortable in letting it grow naturally over time. They tried really hard to push on people by combining it with other more popular google products when it didn’t really make sense (i.e. Youtube). Also, as a teen at the time google plus just felt nerdy and weird. It didn’t really feel like something they cool kids would use so no one used it.

    • twistedtxb@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The concept of who you chose to share your status was cumbersome. It at least not auntie or uncle friendly

      I don’t remember what it was called? Spaces?

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t remember what it was called? Spaces?

        Circles. It was a killer feature at the time, the idea of different feeds for different groups, all in one profile. Too bad there weren’t enough groups to make it useful.

    • debounced@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      and from what i remember, staying true to typical google fashion, they fucked it up by not opening up the “beta” when they had a critical mass forming behind it. then only to force everyone into having a profile a year or whatever later. lol, too late. i think most of us understood that anything associated with google is assumed to be a never-ending “beta”, so no idea what they were thinking or waiting for.

      • MetalFingers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it was definitely the super long beta period where you needed an invite killed it. I knew a ton of people who were interested that gave up

        • kadu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s easy to say now, but Orkut (another Google social network, mostly used in Brazil) also had a beta invite system… And that helped it grow tremendously. The secrecy and “status” of getting invited made people go wild - they would even sell invites.

          The strategy can work. It’s just very timing sensitive.

  • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I kind of feel like a single Lemmy instance will domonate dominate and become the defacto instance that everyone just joins.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think that’s against the plan with Lemmy and distributed instances, but they can improve sign up, and make it possible to migrate your user between instances, or do some unique username across all instances.

      A cool feature would also be that a user could backup all their posts and votes.

    • H4Lambda@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The whole system is crap.

      We should have gotten something that’s actually decentralised and P2P like Aether.

      What we got was centralised servers + a glorified RSS feed that enables even more echo chambers than Reddit did… The fediverse is doomed to remain irrelevant imho

    • ruben@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Since people post to channels that you can search for and subscribe to, there is no incentive for that to happen.

    • CCL@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think a big help to avoid this is if any “official” apps automatically point to something like lemmyverse search or Fediverse Observer rather than Join Lemmy or any single instance.
      Mastodon.socialwas already by far the largest before the only app named “mastodon” available in the major mobile repositories was built to automatically have you create an account on mastodon.social to “Make it easier for the normies”.

      The fact that I dont’ even know the name of any lead developers of #lemmy as opposed to /u/gargon@mastodon.social is probably a good sign too.

  • dunestorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why you should never adopt Google services, there’s a high chance they will kill it off given their awful track record.

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the biggest miss Google had was with Google Wave. It was way ahead of its time, and absolutely crashed and burned at launch because of the invite-only model.

      I bought a Google OnHub router, which was amazing. It was marketed as the most “future-proof” router at the time. Then Google made Google WiFi mesh routers around a year later, and OnHub was never marketed or mentioned again. Now, in addition to my already concerning privacy issues around Google services, I don’t trust that they will release quality, supported products.

    • Flat Pluto Society@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should’ve called it Google Circles. Google Plus just sounded like some kind of premium subscription to Google and not like a social network.

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’ve been running around the Fediverse for two years now and the name has yet to grow on me. Makes it slightly difficult to explain to people who are interested. The “iverse” part makes it sound like a metaverse type project which gives some people pause -because of the hype-flop cycle and, of course, all the crypto scams associated with that. Have to begin the pitch with “but it has nothing to do with [that], so don’t worry.” (Edit because autocorrect)

    • Venutian Spring@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t care about the name much, but it’s going to make searching for anything on here through a regular search engine cumbersome. Lemmy is just going to bring up results to the late motorhead singer

  • MrFagtron9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google+ didn’t work because they didn’t push it hard enough and they made it an invite only beta instead of just allowing everyone to join.

    Yes - I’m being serious they didn’t push it hard enough. If you had a Gmail or YouTube account it should have just instantly become a Google+ account in some sort of private mode so it doesn’t inadvertently leak your info.

    If they would have just pushed it out to everyone, day one, mandatory, no opt out, then we’d still have Google+ today.

    Like if they made Google Talk the default messaging client on Android we’d still have Google Talk. I don’t recall Apple making iMessage an optional messaging app you don’t have to use.

  • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only place I’ve ever accidentally uploaded a dick pic and so glad I had like 2 friends on there who never checked lol. It was a fun 2 weeks.

  • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The beauty of the Fediverse is that no single entity controls it… In 12 years, I’d wager we’re still around.

    • elkaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would wager most of nowadays instances have either fallen into obscurity or just finished existing, I think we will see instancea more focused in scalability if thr fediverse grows in popularity, whoch will kind of dominate the space.

  • Carter@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I loved Google+ at the time but I was invested in the Google services ecosystem back then.

  • BeezKnuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean this post has 1200 upvotes. Considering most people don’t engage with the voting system that makes me think that there’s a decent amount of people here. At the very least it means there’s a lot of people here who engage with the community. More come every day. If this post were on Reddit, it would be on r/all right now. That’s not bad for a community with a fraction of the users.

    I think that in 10 years this place will be doing alright. I think the growth that’s happened in the last few months won’t last, but I think that growth will still steadily happen. The reddexodus doesn’t happen every day but with most social media platforms shitting their geriatric pants more and more lately, I think a consistent flow of refugees will come here.

    • 👽🍻👽@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is extremely interesting. So many products that I’ve never heard of and many of them were actually around for 6-12 years before being axed or coming up on death soon. A lot of these I had heard of and even used occasionally over the years and I didn’t realize were gone now.

    • joystick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, so many products I didn’t realize were dead. I remember when they were pushing Duo.

    • BuoyantTrain37@lemmy.loungerat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some of these are fucking wild

      Killed over 1 year ago, Cameos on Google allowed celebrities and other public figures to record video responses to the most common questions asked about them which would be shown to users in Google Search results. It was over 3 years old.

      Imagine googling “does Bruno Mars is gay?” and Bruno Mars himself shows up to tell you if he is or doesn’t

  • Omsorg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually liked Google plus… but like everything Google create, they killed it.

      • JoYo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        per post scoping was nice.

        I didn’t have to manually tag each account, just select the circle and publish.