• FaeDrifter@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That very clearly frames NATO as a good thing since otherwise the orcs would invade you.

    I wouldn’t call anyone an orc, but Russia is an imperialist power trying to expand its border through a military invasion, so that is always something you need to consider. I don’t consider it to be a good thing to lay down and let colonizers run over you.

    NATO is not good, but Putin gives reason for NATO to not disband yet.

    Never mind the fact that NATO expansion was the reason for the war

    Lol, no. Did it influence Putin? Sure. Did it make the decision to lie about invading and then immediately after invade like he’s a helpless little puppet on strings? No.

    The $1 billion question is why isn’t Putin reaching out to create defensive treaties with his neighbors first. Why not a defense treaty with Ukraine?

    Once you can figure that out, your worldview will start to be a lot more sane.

    Late Roman empire often had demented old men as emperors who didn’t actually make any decisions.

    The US is not a late state empire like Rome. That’s a * hits bong * “what if history is just like repeating itself over and over again man” kind of take. Not that no similarities exist.

    Just list for me for how many years the US has a demented old man in charge.

      • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The $1 billion question is why isn’t Putin reaching out to create defensive treaties with his neighbors first. Why not a defense treaty with Ukraine?

        Because your regime ran a coup in Ukraine in 2014 and overthrew a democratically elected government to put literal fascists in power. Here’s western media reporting on your friends

        This is astonishingly stupid, you completely sidestepped the question. Let’s assume your point about 2014 is true, that’s still 23 years Russia did not form a treaty, which would have prevented the coup. That should have been the easiest, most obvious first move to counter NATO. Instead Russia is tearing itself apart trying to keep its claws dug into a little bit of Ukrainian territory.

        In any scenario where you create an image of the west as some kind of empire overlord powerhouse that manipulates all global events, you make Russia and ex-Soviets look hopelessly stupid and incompetent.

          • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There was no need for a treaty because there weren’t any tensions between Ukraine and Russia, Ukraine also expressed no ambitions to join NATO until the coup, you get that right? All the problems started after the coup.

            Let me get this right, all the experts are warning about NATO expansion putting pressure on Russia, but Russia is feeling no pressure from NATO expansion. All the experts are warning about it! But there’s no tension. Again, you’re just saying that ex-Soviets are severely stupid and incompetent, because apparently this was a big deal since 1997, but also no big deal until 2014. Your timelines are incoherent.

            In what universe is Russia is tearing itself apart exactly? Russian economy is growing, the government has higher approval rating than pretty much any western country, and Russia managed to refocus its trade away from the west. Even mainstream western media is openly admitting all this now.

            Lol, I would approve of my government if disapproving meant being thrown out of a window.

            You know what, you’re right. Russia is doing great, we’re going to see a massive victory over Ukraine and the war will be over. Any day now.

            The reason US emerged as a global hegemon out of WW2

            Obviously the US had a huge economic advantage, explain how that economic advantage leads to the extreme geopolitical incompetence of ex-Soviets. The incompetence that means they can’t from treaties, they dangle like a puppet by NATO strings, and start wars they can’t finish.

              • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know what part of this you’re having trouble wrapping your head around. Ukraine was a neutral state that did trade with both Russia and the west and wasn’t joining any military alliances with either side. If you have some new information nobody knows about that contradicts this then feel free to share it.

                It’s not about just Ukraine. You’re so narrow, it’s like you can’t engage with my points outside of a pre-programmed response. Russia could be forming treaties with ANY and ALL neighboring countries. There is (almost…) no reason not to. If NATO has the geopolitical savvy to expand with treaties, what is stopping Russia. That’s what you need to figure out.

                You’ll have to forgive me, I keep forgetting I’m talking to a child.

                Lol, do you deny the high rate of people falling out of windows in Russia?

                How do you think this war is going to end exactly?

                Likely not for years, and either Russia will back out, or they will successfully genocide the people of Ukraine and take the bombed-out land.

                What extreme geopolitical incompetence are you talking about exactly? Last I checked, Soviets managed to fight against your despotic regime for over 70 years.

                “Soviets managed to fight” you mean ex-Soviets, because the USSR is kaput. Plus all the NATO territory expansion, the US empire growing its collection of vassal states, extracting and growing its wealth. That is your story, not mine. What does Russia have to show since 1991?

                  • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    What is this then ignromaus? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_Security_Treaty_Organization

                    Exactly, now explain why NATO is overwhelmingly more successful in expanding its alliance. Why does 80% of Ukraine’s population support joining NATO instead of SCTO?

                    Weird way to say Russia will protect people in Donbas from the fascist regime your country is sponsoring.

                    Oh right, protection is when you genocide the majority to protect the minority.

                    You have a literal despot who has not relinquished power in over two decades leading an invasion, bombing cities, shooting civilians, and raping their wives and daughters. Tell me more about what you know of fascist regimes.