• czech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Your comment would be accurate if it cost them $80B to recover $1B.

    Your own quote points out:

    $80 billion for the IRS over a 10-year period.

    Which makes your comments misleading, not accurate.

    • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      So in other words it cost $8b to recover $1b? And this is seen as a good thing?!?! That make as much sense as toilet paper math

    • noneya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If the program costs $80B, then it costs $80B. And it’s taken in…well, lemme check my records…$1B.

      Sorry if my brain can’t do the mental hula hoops it takes to calculate that any other way.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The IRS cost $16B total to operate in 2023. Federal tax revenue in 2023 was $4.44T.

        This idea that you’re trying to project, that funding the IRS is somehow not worth the cost, is absolutely bonkers.

        • noneya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s not what the article says. I’m just reading and quoting.

      • Nerdrage717@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        To be fair, if it costs 80b in 10 years and has only been implemented for 2 years, then it only cost 16b to recover 1b.

        • noneya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Listen, I’m just reading and quoting. Take it up with the writer.