• ignirtoq@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The $80 billion is spread over 10 years, and Republicans have already reduced that by $20 billion. Also, that’s the total increase in funding from the Inflation Reduction Act, whereas this $1 billion recovered is only one success story of many. Please don’t make such misleading statements.

      • noneya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The Inflation Reduction Act, which passed in 2022 without any Republican votes, approved about $80 billion for the IRS over a 10-year period.

        Democrats say the money is meant to help the IRS ramp up its enforcement efforts on high-income taxpayers as well as improve its archaic taxpayer services system.

        From a linked article. I’m not sure how much the “archaic taxpayer services system” costs, but my comment is accurate.

        • czech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Your comment would be accurate if it cost them $80B to recover $1B.

          Your own quote points out:

          $80 billion for the IRS over a 10-year period.

          Which makes your comments misleading, not accurate.

          • noneya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            If the program costs $80B, then it costs $80B. And it’s taken in…well, lemme check my records…$1B.

            Sorry if my brain can’t do the mental hula hoops it takes to calculate that any other way.

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              The IRS cost $16B total to operate in 2023. Federal tax revenue in 2023 was $4.44T.

              This idea that you’re trying to project, that funding the IRS is somehow not worth the cost, is absolutely bonkers.

              • noneya@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                That’s not what the article says. I’m just reading and quoting.

            • Nerdrage717@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              To be fair, if it costs 80b in 10 years and has only been implemented for 2 years, then it only cost 16b to recover 1b.

              • noneya@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Listen, I’m just reading and quoting. Take it up with the writer.

          • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            So in other words it cost $8b to recover $1b? And this is seen as a good thing?!?! That make as much sense as toilet paper math

        • ignirtoq@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Your comment is technically accurate, but leaves out context and relevant information, which makes it misleading. My comment is accurate as well.

    • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agreed! It’d be MUCH BETTER if we used that 80B to PAY for those Millionaire’s and Billionaire’s Yachts INSTEAD of collecting over a BILLION in less then a Year!