cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/3974080

Hey everyone. I made a casual survey to see if people can tell the difference between human-made and AI generated art. Any responses would be appreciated, I’m curious to see how accurately people can tell the difference (especially those familiar with AI image generation)

    • popcar2@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, it’s the only model that manages to get text right, and the results are usually pretty consistent. It’s a big step forward.

      AI generated photo of a cat saying "I'm king of the world!"

      • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Base SDXL and SD1.5 with the help of controlnet can both do text too. I forgot Deep Floyd/IF can as well.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Control nets are kind of “cheating”, though, they’re a form of image-to-image where you provide them with something to trace over or otherwise guide them. I think in this area the open-source field has (briefly) fallen behind, we’ll need another round of catchup. That’s fine, though. Let competition drive hard.

    • lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kind of. It can generate readable text, but not all the time. It will frequently turn parts of your prompt into text that aren’t meant to be text or mix perfectly readable text with AI gibberish: