A potential plan by Republican leaders to steal the 2024 presidential election. The plan involves delaying the certification of election results in key battleground states, potentially decreasing the overall number of electors appointed and allowing Donald Trump to win the presidency through a contingent election, whereby the House of Representatives, not the Electoral College, determines the president.

  • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    And this is where Speaker Johnson becomes critical to the whole “secret” plan. In 2020, Nancy Pelosi was speaker of the House. If states had tried to get cute and not submit their electors by the December 11 deadline, Pelosi would just have extended the deadline. But Speaker Johnson surely won’t. If electors are not submitted by December 11, he’ll likely declare the process “over” and say that the electors appointed by that date are the only ones allowed to vote for president.

    Isn’t Speaker Johnson subject to recall? Maybe it’s time that happened.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Wasn’t this also settled in Bush v Gore?

      The states must submit electors by the certification date. That’s why the 2000 recount had to be stopped.

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        58 minutes ago

        I doubt the current supreme court will do anything even though in 2000 that decision helped the republican. They’ll find a reason to flip.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They’ve said it out loud. Heritage foundation guy has been saying we’re in the middle of a bloodless coup, bloodless if the left allows it.

    The historian, Heather Cox Richardson, can walk you though the legal channels for an election steal, provided the Speaker of the House is on board. I’m not going to dig to find it again. She’s on YouTube.

    This is going to be like Roe, isn’t it? Where people know exactly what’s about to happen then act surprised when it does.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “Preventing this scenario requires Republicans to act in good faith and certify the results of elections that go against their guy.”

  • Not2Dopey@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I think the Republicans screwed themselves bit here. With the Supreme Court decision giving the president immunity for official Acts, Biden could just throw all those fuckers in jail as an official act for trying to stage a coup and that would give the presidency to Harris.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes, Biden’s mindset still hasn’t caught up with the present circumstances, and probably won’t.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          It’s all Democrats in office. They’re a bunch of high road cowards that will ride the high road right off a cliff just so they can smell their own farts and exclaim how virtuous they are for not having taken extreme measures to protect us.

  • iN8sWoRLd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It would be worth looking into which states have wording in their Constitutions that include “shall certify” which would make the stalling tactic a crime.

    Also, anyone who voted in a state whose electors were not sent on time would have a valid civil rights case against that state’s officials and they would all have standing because they were personally harmed. The number of potential lawsuits would be overwhelming and perhaps ruinous to anyone found guilty. Not sure that fear of that would be enough to stop them, but also they have to worry about losing their next election (though if it worked they might hope to be rewarded by the winning administration).

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    The reason it didn’t happen line this last time is that the legislators and Governors whose job it is to certify the EC electors also get their job through elections. Some of them may have been re-elected on the very same ballot. If they start playing games and saying that now, despite a clear victory by one side, they can’t affirm that victory, it will call into question their own electoral legitimacy.

    One yo-yo suggested this in NC a few weeks ago - that after the hurricane, voting would be such a difficult chore that they should just skip the Presidential election and give Trump all their EC votes, and that idea was quickly given the mocking it deserved.

    State and local election officials, of every party, take pride in conducting their elections in a fair manner, and reporting results on time. The distributed nature of our elections is actually an asset here, because each state governs their own elections locally, necessitating schemes like this to be duplicated in each state theyare intended for. And the “safe harbor” provisions function to make sure that as long as certification is done on time, there is very little that Congress can do other than count them . At least, I hope…

  • Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why don’t we just force runoff elections when things are off. It costs a few million, yes. But isn’t it better for people to decide instead of one judge?

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because that would change the results. People would be able to change their votes. It could result in yet another things are off. It doesn’t resolve. It complicates.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      There’s also just full-blown civil war where states completely revolt against the US government. Nothing is off the table with these psychopaths in charge

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        We can short-circuit all that by saying “Hey, you jokers want to leave? Then go already, and please leave your US passports in that basket by the door on your way out. By the way, here is a bill for your share of the Federal Debt, apportioned by population like the Constitution you say you revere says it should be. We also added the cost of all the military bases you are buying from us.”

        Seriously, let the fuckers go. I’d be sad to see Austin go. But, really, that’s about it.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago
    The Nation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Nation:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Nation is generally reliable. In the “About” section of their website, they identify as progressive. Most editors consider The Nation a partisan source whose statements should be attributed. The publication’s opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline. Take care to ensure that content from The Nation constitutes due weight in the article and conforms to the biographies of living persons policy.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/little-secret-trump-johnson-election/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support