He won the primary so they have to run him. They’ve still unofficially backed Cuomo and even Adams, though, and all of the NY Dem leadership were either late in endorsing him or haven’t yet.

He won the primary in a surprise landslide against the establishment favorite and they’ve been sulking ever since.

In contrast, Adams won his primary by a tiny margin and they were falling over each other to declare him “the future of the party” the very next day.

Classic IOC behavior: refusing to sanction a fascist apartheid regime committing genocide, but immediately ostracizing any country that does 🤦🤬

Except for all three branches being taken over by a fascist kakistocracy that ignores and invents laws at will and with absolute impunity, you mean? Sure.

I’d argue that it constitutes a pretty significant change, though.

Appointing anyone without the consent of Jericho Johnson might be de jure allowed and valid, but since it’s against the wishes of the fascist regime, it’s de facto not going to be allowed.

A lot has changed in the 12 years since that article was published…

Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory world champions 40+ years running

Whether or not that’s technically true, that’s so far from how they normally do it that neither Republicans nor Neoliberal “the system is fine, actually. Just needs a few minor tweaks” Democrats and “independents” would ever accept it as legitimate or even consider going through with it in the first place.

This is a perfect example of how EXTREMELY wrong the system defenders are to ignore what the left has been warning about for several decades.

the antisemitism group Anti-Defamation League

Looks like they accidentally described a zionist group accurately!

Then they’ll say they’ll leave the country

Which they never will. You could (and should) raise their tax rate all the way to 90% and the US system would STILL be better for enabling their excesses and protecting both their wealth and themselves than any other, since that’s what it’s been tailored specifically for since January 1981.

I don’t want a load of freeloading companies or billionaires. If you can get rich using public stuff like roads and stuff then you should want to contribute.

rAmen, brother/sister/other!

I’m happy to pay taxes for the betterment of society, I just want the wealthiest to pay their fair fucking share. How radical of me.

It’s just Soup tea for my family, officer!

Arizona Tea Party when?

They’ve successfully gotten away with grifting a ton of money off it without being punished for it.

Successful outcomes for regular people aren’t part of the criteria of these cretins.

Guilty ✋

It’s pronounced like this

Giraffic Interchange Format made sense

In no world does that collection of words ring true, regardless of context.

you could depict things other than giraffes

But why would you?

Simple: they just applied Wilhoit’s Law

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition … There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” --Frank Wilhoit”

And then there’s Kash Patel’s bizarre children’s book trilogy…

✊

Instructions unclear, became a grass simp.

Not true! I’m definitely not eligible, and I’m not listed anywhere in the article.

Maybe she’s trying to become besties with Tay-Tay? 🤷