It’s referring to both. The recompiler links to the Zelda project and basically tells you “if you want to haven an example how to.proceed/what to implement yourself after the recompilation finished, you can use the Zelda project as an example”.
Well, usually those re-compilers or transpilers just translate the binary to some sort of intermediate language and then any backend should be able to compile it for your target system. So, in theory those handheld could be targeted. Problem with this project is that it’s not just “start transpiler, load rom, click go and your port is ready”. It’s more like "ok, here’s your game logic. Now implement the rest (or use several other projects and duct tape their libraries together to get what you want).
Other people’s password be like
JetBrains032024
JetBrains042025
Jetbrains052024
…
My JetBrains accounts be like
JetBrains032024@example.com
JetBrains042024@example.com
JetBrains052024@example.com
…
If paying on a monthly basis, as soon as you pay for 12 consecutive months, you will receive this perpetual fallback license providing you with access to the exact product version for when your 12 consecutive months subscription started. You will receive perpetual fallback licenses for every version you’ve paid 12 consecutive months for.
So, in your example, you unsubscribe in month 15. This means, you paid 14 months so you get to retain the version from month three (which is 12 full paid months to 14). This means a downgrade to 1.0.x and not to 1.2.x
Fifteen Million Merits, IIRC?
Nah, it just marks your question as duplicate.
Why not both?
I found a blog post outlining exactly that. If you use it locally, it will install and start a service temporarily. That service runs as SYSTEM and invokes your command. To succeed, you need to be a local administrator.
If you try the same remote, it tries to access \\remote-server-ip\$admin and installs the service with that. To succeed your current account on your local machine must exist on the remote machine and must be an administrator there.
So in short: It only works, if you’ve already the privilege to do so and the tool itself is not (ab)using a privilege escalation or something like that. Any hacker and virus may do the very same and doesn’t need psexec - it’s just easier for them to use that tool.
Pretendstation Network when? (Context)
Never thought about that, but since these tools just work, when you copy them to your PC… how does psexec do that? It’d either need you to be an administrator (and then it’s not really a privilege escalation as you could have registered any program into the task scheduler or as a service to run as SYSTEM) or it’d need a delegate service, that should only be available when you use an installer - which again wasn’t was has been done when just copying the tool.
Also please pre-install the sysinternals suite, thanks
Do you know the term “trust thermocline”?
Basically it described a problem with the boiling the frog technique. There’s a point for every user at which they’re fed up with the bullshit, lose all trust in you(r company) and are hard to impossible to get back as a customer. Every customer leaving has a little unnoticeable effect on you, but with time there will be so many people that you lost that all your tactics to lock your users in will fail.
When I go back to play a modded Fallout, I do 4.
Do so now and be quick, or wait a while. In a few days a huge next-gen update is dropping and everyone expects mods to be broken afterwards unless they are fixed. Since modding is usually done on PC, you may be able to downgrade the version, but it’s more work.
I read it as “no, we won’t use your data for advertising, but collect it anyways. If you ever dare to stop paying, we’ll retroactively process this data, too”
Yeah, basically you have three options:
Aperture Science.
We do what we must
Because we can.
For the good of all of us.
Except the ones who are dead.
Can’t decide which one is more relevant - the $5 wrench hack, or any sort of blackmailing.
Mein 45 jähriger Kollege:
Ich lieb ihn dafür Ü
Die Instanz ist kaputt, Zugang nur über Apps und Drittfrontends. Schon länger. Ich hab die letzten Tage nicht bewusst Posts von slrpnk gesehen, aber weiß, dass die regelmäßig in meinem All-Feed waren. Daher würde ich eher auf technische Probleme denn einen Block tippen. Wenn wir nicht ins Frontend kommen, kann das der Admin auch nicht.