Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoPentagon Approved Funds for MrBeast, Kelly Clarkson, Guy Fieri in 2023www.rollingstone.comexternal-linkmessage-square71linkfedilinkarrow-up1302arrow-down16file-textcross-posted to: aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
arrow-up1296arrow-down1external-linkPentagon Approved Funds for MrBeast, Kelly Clarkson, Guy Fieri in 2023www.rollingstone.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square71linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
minus-squarenomy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down3·2 years agoHas he really or has he just directed sponsors money to organizations he likes?
minus-squareThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down4·2 years agoWhat’s the difference? This is a legitimate question.
minus-squarenomy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·2 years agoOne is his money, the other isn’t.
minus-squareThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 years agoBut both result in a charity getting money?
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down8·2 years agoThere isn’t a difference in the end result, and they’re desperate to find a reason to hate the guy. He’s not a likeable character, to be fair.
minus-squarenomy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years ago desperate to find a reason to hate the guy Hard to be desperate, there are plenty of reasons to dislike him. Honestly just believing some pseudo-philanthropic character some guy made up for clicks if fucking weird and people need to learn to think critically about things.
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·2 years agoI mean, he’s a slimy character, and I don’t like the guy at all, but he’s either given or raised huge amounts of money to charity through his stunts. And denying that happened just looks bad for you, to be honest.
minus-squarenomy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·2 years agoI’m sure Jimmy doesn’t profit at all from all the money funneled into Beast Philanthropy. Diddy raised a bunch of money too what’s your point?
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·2 years agoI’m genuinely baffled as to what your point is here. Do you think the fact he’s making money doing this is news to me?
minus-squaresartalon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 years agoHe takes credit for the sponsor’s donation. So I would argue it is worse.
Has he really or has he just directed sponsors money to organizations he likes?
What’s the difference?
This is a legitimate question.
One is his money, the other isn’t.
But both result in a charity getting money?
There isn’t a difference in the end result, and they’re desperate to find a reason to hate the guy.
He’s not a likeable character, to be fair.
Hard to be desperate, there are plenty of reasons to dislike him.
Honestly just believing some pseudo-philanthropic character some guy made up for clicks if fucking weird and people need to learn to think critically about things.
I mean, he’s a slimy character, and I don’t like the guy at all, but he’s either given or raised huge amounts of money to charity through his stunts.
And denying that happened just looks bad for you, to be honest.
I’m sure Jimmy doesn’t profit at all from all the money funneled into Beast Philanthropy.
Diddy raised a bunch of money too what’s your point?
I’m genuinely baffled as to what your point is here. Do you think the fact he’s making money doing this is news to me?
He takes credit for the sponsor’s donation. So I would argue it is worse.
A chunk of both, I think.