• leftytighty@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m pretty anti capitalist and wish the whole system would fuck off but they’re not suing because of the lack of performance of their investment, they’re alleging that United didn’t give necessary information to investors

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is unfortunately true, they’ll likely win the case on that angle.

      My point is that legislation shouldn’t guarantee earnings from gambling under unforeseen circumstances. That’s just gambling.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Seriously, how many times have I heard the argument that CEOs should be making “the big bucks” because they’re taking on “the big risks”? Yet except for Brian Thompson, I can’t think of any CEOs who’ve ever actually incurred risks from their “gambles.” They always seem to make cuts to everyone and everything else before accepting a loss, or else jump ship with a golden parachute (and probably go on to fuck up a different company afterwards.) Of course, I can’t deny the possibility that CEOs who fail don’t make the news, and this is just survivorship bias (no pun intended.)

        • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The CEOs aren’t making any risks at all, it’s the shareholders taking risks. The unfairness comes in when the government protects them from their own risk while leaving the poor out to rot.