• jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I know nothing about architecture, but I imagine that the operating costs of a castle are very low given that they’re basically just a big rock.

    • catty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Same problem as churches. The roof costs are astronomical, both internal and external aspects of the roof. The castle will have 2000 windows, all of which will need regular maintenance and because it’s a castle, the tradespeople will be more expensive. The hidden costs are the killer here.

      • fenrasulfr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The reason they are “cheap” to buy is all the maintenance cost indeed.

        But not only that, they are also under what we call monumenten zorg in the netherlands, basically making it near impossible to make any big changes to the building. So for example you are not replace the original windows for ones with double glazing.

        Owning a castle or any really old building in Europe sound more appealing than it really is.

        • catty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yep, in England, “listed building” status and depending on the level, you have to also have specific tradespeople in to do work and you have to maintain it to a certain standard. You don’t really own such buildings, you merely become the custodian and look after them.