Tony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoCompanies That Tried to Save Money With AI Are Now Spending a Fortune Hiring People to Fix Its Mistakesfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up11.19Karrow-down113
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1external-linkCompanies That Tried to Save Money With AI Are Now Spending a Fortune Hiring People to Fix Its Mistakesfuturism.comTony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square122fedilink
minus-squareMangoCats@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·1 day agoWe’ve hired a bunch of Indian guys who are using AI to do their work… the results are marginally better than either approach independently.
minus-squareSaleh@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 day agoa negative times a negative is a positive?
minus-squareMangoCats@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoMore like 0.10 + 0.05 = 0.20, in this case.
minus-squareDie Martin Die@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 day agoTo be fair, 0.2 + 0.1 = 0.30000000000000004
minus-squarefakeaustinfloyd@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoWelcome to the secret robot Internet
minus-squareMangoCats@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoThat’s what happens when you have Intel inside ;o) (Yes, yes, I know, it’s the whole binary based floating point thing, not just Intel, although my Atari 800 BASIC interpreter implemented floating point in BCD, so it didn’t have that issue.)
We’ve hired a bunch of Indian guys who are using AI to do their work… the results are marginally better than either approach independently.
a negative times a negative is a positive?
More like 0.10 + 0.05 = 0.20, in this case.
To be fair, 0.2 + 0.1 = 0.30000000000000004
Welcome to the secret robot Internet
That’s what happens when you have Intel inside ;o)
(Yes, yes, I know, it’s the whole binary based floating point thing, not just Intel, although my Atari 800 BASIC interpreter implemented floating point in BCD, so it didn’t have that issue.)