• 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    I still have literally thousands of clients that use Windows and want support… for these kinds of things. Firefox has recently stopped working on a few things and Brave works better for me right now. It’s not convenience when FF doesn’t work…
    But I digress, Win 11 here and Brave. My choices, for lots of reasons. Lots of linux boxes as well though. Each to their own and all that

  • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    In this thread something I see a lot on lemmy is happening. Maybe someone can give me a hint on how that happens. The post itself is 90% upvotes, while the comment section is really anti-Brave (for good reasons). Do most upvotes come from people scrolling through without looking at the comment section and those with an opinion on the topic dive into it?

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Brave browser blocks Windows feature that takes screenshots of everything you do on your PC

    As does Linux.

  • SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    8 hours ago

    They haven’t blocked the windows feature, they’re using DRM to interfere with it. Microsoft could easily change how the DRM works any time they want, rendering all these hacks useless.

    • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Exactly, how do you even fight with the OS except just making it bit hard for them lol. You have to tell the OS what pixels to put in the screen, there’s literally no way you can hide things from the OS if they want to know.

    • moe90@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      then people can complained it on Brave Github or their official forum and it will be fixed by their team

      • SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        My point was that brave’s solution, like Signal’s, is dependent on microsoft playing fair. If microsoft decides they don’t want brave, signal, or anyone else using DRM to interfere with their screen scraping chatbot, there is not going to be an easy way to fix it.

  • blobchoice@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Unfortunately that would involve using the Brave browser, which is an antifeature in itself.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    A device that surreptitiously gathers information on a target is called a bug, not a feature.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Oh so they’re just doing whatever Firefox is doing in private mode on Android that makes screenshots all black

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      That’s not even the worst thing about him. He also invented JavaScript.

    • szymon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      He could be next husband of Ivanka Trump - I don’t care

      If he provide good service for me - browser which fits my needs. I would even send him money every day

          • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            If fascism was a passive philosophy that didn’t hurt anyone then you might have a point. But as you can see recently it’s extremely dangerous and ruins lives.

            You may not want to mingle with politics, but it doesn’t have the same view.

      • Kris@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        That’s the logic of as long as it benefits ME I don’t care and I support them no matter what they do. This same logic has been applied to all the shitty things done in history like slavery, war and so forth, and the reason the world is the way it is.

          • Kris@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Of course that’s not possible, the issue here is being aware and not caring and in some cases supporting it for convenience and selfishness.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      13 hours ago

      What does that have to do with the browser? Last I checked, browsers aren’t transphobic.

      You do you, but I personally refuse to make product choices based on the person who makes it. Brave is the least bad chromium browser, so I use it as a backup to my main Gecko-based browser. I’m not a fan of Mozilla either, but that’s irrelevant since I pick my software based on what it does, not based on the management of the company that builds it.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The only two there that bother me are the affiliate code thing (reminds me of the Honey drama) and installing extra software without consent. The first was a bad call and probably related with how their ad replacement stuff works (if anything, they should merely axe affiliate links; Firefox has that as an option), and this"solution" to the latter is pretty odd to me:

          reinstall the browser without admin rights

          Why would a browser need admin rights in the first place? I haven’t used Windows in well over a decade, so I don’t think that particular one would be an issue for me.

          The rest can be grouped as:

          • bugs - bug fixes generally don’t get prioritized until enough users complain; I would be very picky if I was an at risk person (activist or whatever) and would probably only use Tor browser
          • opt-in services
          • their marketing department

          My options for chromium browsers are:

          • something with ineffective ad blocking
          • Opera - I used it before it became a chromium browser, then it went downhill; not FOSS
          • Brave, with all its warts

          Since ad blocking and FOSS are my prerequisites, Brave basically wins by default.

        • RiQuY@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Vivaldi is not open source, so for me it doesn’t count as a valid option.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I‘m not even pro Brave but all that ad stuff is opt-in so it doesn‘t matter as long as you don‘t want to see ads. The arguments in this thread are starting to just loop in circles. Essentially using Brave is fine if you stick to the default. There‘s no sleazy stuff if you don‘t enable it and the CEO also doesn‘t make a dime from you if that‘s something you‘re concerned about. You could of course use a different chromium browser if you want but it‘s virtually the same thing.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I would not choose to use a product made by people I disagree with but leaving that aside:

        Is it the least bad? Why not degoogled chrome? Or chromium? Even vivaldi seems like a better choice.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Ad blocking mostly. That’s literally all I need in a chromium browser, because I only use it on a handful of sites that don’t work properly in Firefox.

          Chromium is also okay, but no ad blocker. I have that installed as well in the really unlikely case that the ad blocker gets in the way.

          99% of my browsing is on a Firefox browser, and 99% of the rest is on Brave. I use it so infrequently the “time saved” metric is a merely seconds.

      • Engywook@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Actually, I consider Brave the best (or the least bed…) browser on the market. Period. The fact that it isn’t made by Mozilla is a plus for me.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I don’t like Mozilla either, but here are my priorities in a web browser:

          1. FOSS
          2. Privacy tools - includes ad blocking; I’d actually be okay with ads if they didn’t track me
          3. Promotes open web standards - rendering engine diversity is critical here, I don’t want a repeat of the IE era
          4. Security
          5. Performance

          Firefox ticks all of them, and my issues with Mozilla as an org don’t really come into play. I use a fork on my phone, but I use Firefox on my laptop and desktop because I trust the binaries coming from my Linux distribution maintainers (part of 4).