https://zirk.us/@ShaulaEvans/115773818039339000

this is what really sets leftists apart from liberals imo.

liberals like to decorate themselves with the nimbus of morality but when it comes to stepping up to fascism and protesting even if it’s not like a fun parade but serious and uncomfortable. Or just if the weather is bad.

Or when it comes to being self critical about your own learned patterns of behavior and thinking… they are nowhere to be seen, not to be relied on and it does real damage, as we can see.

  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Because other articles already clarified that. If one law says “drinking is illegal”, another law does not need to say “drinking while being with friends is illegal”

    It normally goes 1…2…3…, so if 1 already says something, 5 does not need to repeat something about being exclusively external.

    • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Lmao we have a NATO expert here

      Ok, can you point me which article says it’s for external threats only?

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Honestly, not worth my time.

        I’m not going to be your assistant in searching for stuff, but it goes something along these lines if internal attack happens - Article 1 is invoked. If whatever happened is not resolved peacefully, article 4 is invoked. Everyone gathers around and reminds the defender that NATO and Article 5 is linked to United Charters, and that (4-2?) quite clearly puts that into words (about inner conflicts), then everyone finished their high end meal and goes home.

        Lmao we have a NATO expert here

        TBH I sometimes bombard a family member of mine with questions, who’s an officer in army that’s under NATO.