As businesses downsize in the hybrid-work era, empty offices could become 'flats for millionaires with little daylight' – or an opportunity to reinvent the city centre.

As more employees work from home in the hybrid-work era, many companies are finding they need smaller offices. Compared to pre-pandemic floorplans designed to house as many workers as possible, more businesses are looking towards more compact but higher-quality spaces for the future.

According to figures from global commercial real estate firm JLL, 48% of clients in major markets, including the UK, Germany and France are seeking to decrease their footprints in the next three to five years as a result. “Our clients are working out what to do with the space they’ve got by analysing data from recent years to come up with long-term plans,” says Stephanie Hyde, CEO UK and CEO EMEA Markets at JLL. “In addition, many leases are expiring, companies are pressing ahead to meet sustainability agendas and they’re focusing on getting hybrid working right.”

This imminent corporate downsizing is set to have huge ramifications for the real estate industry. As more leases end, experts anticipate a tidal wave of available commercial space on the market. According to March 2024 data from workplace research firm Leesman, total space reductions could reach 40% across its global client base of 766 firms. Projected onto central London, if the same proportion of the city’s occupiers opt to reduce their footprints, this corporate downsize would be the equivalent to 56.6 million sq ft (5.26 million sq m) of office space.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    16·
    6 months ago

    From what I understand, you can convert a lot of buildings that were built before the middle of the century; it’s the massive onees that are the issue. Older buildings were designed to let in light and air from the outside. If you break them into apartments, you can get something that’s a reasonable size with windows.

    But if you try to convert one of those massive square skyscrapers, you run into issues. You could break each floor into a set of massive apartments, but there aren’t enough people who can afford them. You can make really long, thin apartments with windows at one end, but most people don’t want to live in something that’s 10-15 feet wide, a third of a city block long, with windows at one end. Or you can put the apartments around the edges and then do something with the center space; say, put tenant storage space every 3 floors, a gym every 8 floors, a play area every 5 floors, etc. But that raises the cost of the apartments and incurs monthly fees to clean and maintain those areas.

    • wjrii@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      6 months ago

      do something with the center space

      A simple shared courtyard on most floors could be valuable, but yeah, it sounds like one of the biggest challenges is making attractive housing out of them. With real estate being somewhat non-fungible though, that becomes a pricing issue. People would live in the high-rise equivalent of a single-wide or container house for free. They wouldn’t for 10 million bucks. Does the inflection point in-between match with the economics of doing the conversion? Every building and every city will have a different calculation.

      And yes, there is a nagging sense of boring dystopia going through my brain in all this, though tempered by the sense that we shouldn’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good safely and affordably housed. When do we force Hiro Protagonist to move into his storage unit?