• noneya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The Inflation Reduction Act, which passed in 2022 without any Republican votes, approved about $80 billion for the IRS over a 10-year period.

    Democrats say the money is meant to help the IRS ramp up its enforcement efforts on high-income taxpayers as well as improve its archaic taxpayer services system.

    From a linked article. I’m not sure how much the “archaic taxpayer services system” costs, but my comment is accurate.

    • czech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Your comment would be accurate if it cost them $80B to recover $1B.

      Your own quote points out:

      $80 billion for the IRS over a 10-year period.

      Which makes your comments misleading, not accurate.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        So in other words it cost $8b to recover $1b? And this is seen as a good thing?!?! That make as much sense as toilet paper math

      • noneya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If the program costs $80B, then it costs $80B. And it’s taken in…well, lemme check my records…$1B.

        Sorry if my brain can’t do the mental hula hoops it takes to calculate that any other way.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The IRS cost $16B total to operate in 2023. Federal tax revenue in 2023 was $4.44T.

          This idea that you’re trying to project, that funding the IRS is somehow not worth the cost, is absolutely bonkers.

          • noneya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s not what the article says. I’m just reading and quoting.

        • Nerdrage717@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          To be fair, if it costs 80b in 10 years and has only been implemented for 2 years, then it only cost 16b to recover 1b.

          • noneya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Listen, I’m just reading and quoting. Take it up with the writer.

    • ignirtoq@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Your comment is technically accurate, but leaves out context and relevant information, which makes it misleading. My comment is accurate as well.