• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    the software side of things is what more important

    Nice thing about that is software is updatable, I find it silly when people say the hardware is nice, but the software isn’t there so nope. As if the software was as permanent as the hardware lol

    • Dave.@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      As if the software was as permanent as the hardware lol

      There’s no guarantee that the software will ever be updated to something that the user finds usable though.

      Google could just one day go “meh, we don’t think folding displays are where we want to be right now”, and - ta-da! - you’re left with a folding doorstop and Google’s got yet another entry on the “killed by Google” list.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s true, but Google Pixels are also one of the few remaining US brands that allows you to somewhat freely unlock the BL

        So custom roms can easily be had, in fact GrapheneOS is one that specifically targets Pixels in general

        It’s the 2nd biggest reason I didn’t jump onto the Foldy bandwagon with Samshit (#1 being how damn narrow the cover screen is)

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Everyone of my phones aged out from lack of OS updates, not because the hardware failed or was too slow.

      I have a box of them.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s a valid concern, though. The tablet experience has always sucked on Android, so the foldable experience is trying to hybridize with something the OS has never been able to get right.

      But the inverse is also true. There’s no telling if a future software update will take a good experience and make it terrible.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s true, but software is software, it can be modified by end users to suit their needs, especially on Pixel foldables which are one of the few remaining US brands that still somewhat freely allow you to unlock the bootloader.

        So in that case with an unlockable BL, one could even flash a custom ROM that fixes any issues

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Of course, but I think when people complain about the software, it’s that out-of-the-box experience they are describing. The vast majority of users are not savvy enough to flash custom ROMs, sideload, or even install a new launcher. And even for those with the expertise to do so, it’s extra work.

          But then that also doesn’t quite address the app situation either. Android, for better or worse, is all about scalable interfaces to accommodate an infinitely wide array of devices, but most people with a tablet will tell you that they don’t like “tablet” apps that are just rescaled phone apps with way too much whitespace. So there may be something to be said about the way Apple maintains iPad OS separately from iOS, with more stringent design standards to adhere to for app developers to have their iPad apps listed in their app store.