• Krompus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    What is this photo? What’s he wearing on his chest? Looks like some weird PCB with buttons?

    Looks neat, I hope it’s real, but I suspect it’s AIGI.

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    157
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Do you want to import your settings from your previous browser?”

    “Do you want to make Chrome your default browser?”

    “Are you sure?”

    FUCK OFF, I’M ONLY USING THIS STUPID PROGRAM BECAUSE MY ASSHOLE UTILITY COMPANY’S WEBSITE DOESN’T WORK WITH FIREFOX

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Try user agent switcher. More often than not, websites work just fine with firefox but refuse to load when the browser identifies as not-fascist-google-trash.

      • bender223@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yup, I like using a combo of ungoogled chromium and librewolf depending on which works better for certain websites or web apps . To me, Linux is about using the right tool for the job.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        It will happen when webUSB is an actual web standard with a proper RFC

        I don’t see that happening

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It sure would be nice to have WebSerial as well. For some reason Mozilla seems to think users can’t be trusted with it. They could at least add a compile time option to enable it. If someone knows how to compile a browser, they are probably smart enough not to give random websites access to their devices.

  • jia_tan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    A windows user downloading a random executable and unchecking all of the boxes that install malware (it is easier than pressing one “Install” button in an app store):

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    If anything, I only use ungoogled chromium if a website refuses to work in Firefox. Had a financial fraud and identity theft scam the other day hosted on a Singaporean form service thing that I had to report using that browser because the send report button wasn’t working on FF.

    As much as I don’t like it, it’s probably a good idea to have a backup chromium based browser like ungoogled chromium just in case. Just be sure to not be like me and actually have it in some sort of sandbox rather than running the flatpak on its own.

    • klu9@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was under the impression Flatpaks are sandboxed. (I am not an expert.)

      Flatpak is a utility for software deployment and package management for Linux. It provides a sandbox environment in which users can run application software in (partial) isolation from the rest of the system.

      I also keep Ungoogled Chromium around as a last resort (AppImage in my case).

      • monogram@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Flatpaks are as sandboxed as the sandbox settings you give them, check out if the defaults are satisfactory on Flatseal before running it.

        • klu9@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Thanks for the info.

          Personally, I’ve been avoiding Flatpaks anyway on my main machine, but not out of security concerns. Mainly to do with size and the update frequency.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Even the author says Flatpak is a sandbox.

          The most simple but also least effective sandbox type is the container or wrapper sandbox that builds an isolated process environment and then executes the target application inside.

          Flatpak provides an isolated runtime environment using a container type sandbox to execute the target application inside.

          … there are two issues that prevent flatpak from providing a real sandbox environment…

          Just that it’s no true scotsman, I mean sandbox.