• HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    vor 18 Stunden

    Lol, I’m a software developer that started by writing legacy windows software, I know exactly how much (little) has changed.

    It is this perspective that exposes your bias and colors your perception.

    We live in a post-Heartbleed world. We live in a post-UAC world. We constantly find new bugs and vulnerabilities, and they cannot always be patched without massive changes to the architecture. We cannot forever maintain old systems that cultivated bad habits in it’s users.

    Not all change is good, but all change is inevitable.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      vor 14 Stunden

      No that perspective is what makes me understand that when corporations talk about obsceleting things for security reasons, it’s almost always not actually because of security, because it would be a little less profitable to continue support.

      And Valve didnt have to build a business around always checking in DRM if they didn’t want to support old clients, and they have more than enough resources to continue support.

      • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        vor 10 Stunden

        Can I hold you to the decisions you made 20 years ago? I bought that program you built decades ago, that means I’m entitled to your continued support. And don’t you even think about getting paid, your support should be free. You shouldn’t have built and sold the software if you can’t support it…