• quips@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sure but 99.99% of store meat is not this. Its factory farmed animals stacked in pens living in their own piss and shit their entire lives just before they are slaughtered young

    • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, and we can argue all day long about the morality of that specific way of raising animals for meat, but that doesn’t touch the question of whether or not it’s moral to eat meat in general.

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          They just did.

          Eating meat = a neutral action that has no moral dilemma.

          How we produce meat products = a large and complex question that does pose an ethical/moral dilemma centered around methods of production.

          How is that so hard to understand?

            • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Never said it was moral. I said it was specifically amoral, as in “has nothing to do with your arbitrary sense of morality”. Try reading again.

              • quips@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I have trouble understanding how it could be amoral. Every time you eat meat you are making the choice to contribute to crimes than the holocaust? Who, without your contribution, would have a reduced capacity to commit suffering.