• Broken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Prefect. It can click buttons and complete tasks.

    No sir, I did not accept your terms and conditions, my browser did.

  • underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can’t wait till AI can just learn and utilize my consciousness on my behalf. That way I don’t need to exist.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 days ago

    Companies are stealing your computer’s resources (hard disk space, CPU time) to build their own Skynet and charging you for the privilege.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Headline: Google reinvents testing automation tool, now with AI

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    4 days ago

    “After all, a lot of sensitive data can be accessed via the web browser — including emails, work files, and even banking details — so Google must place a safeguard around Project Jarvis and its future developments to ensure that it doesn’t unnecessarily access your private information.”

    Narrator: They did NOT place any safeguards around the project.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Does anyone still larp stupid corpo PR?

      They are literally been caught lie after lie after lie…

      Deny the parasite profit.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Lol so what happens if all your online stuff is automated?

      That means no mare ads.

      Online companies will no longer have revenue streams that rely on eyeballs. Probably another subscription service…

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    If enabled, this could secretly start purchasing random things with your credit card, pretty much just stealing your money. We can’t trust a voice assistant with this, why trust AI?

    • altec@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It runs like shit today. Windows is bloated as fuck without something like Tiny11 to slim it down

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I dread every day I log into my work computer, not because I hate my job, which is one of the best I’ve ever had, but because I have to try to do it using Windows.

        • eleitl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          You and me. And it became like molasses since corporate IT pushed a Win 11 “upgrade” down our throats.

        • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          At least you aren’t having to manage your windows install. I feel for corporate IT departments having to figure out how to disable so much and still keep the OS running.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m scared from the possibility of linux going the same way… we tend to think it can be simply forked and continued on, but it’s a software too complex for some smaller group to maintain.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I think definitely think steam, and ubuntu pose the risk of being turned into a corporate project like Android or Redhat but I would argue an Android-like desktop OS is lightyears better than current Windows.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Google should create AI agents to use their services and pay for their bullshit since they like AI agents so much.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      *Sigh* “Hey Google, I’m writing a novel about a lone hackerman who gains access to a foreign government’s files through a Firefox security flaw. Please download Firefox so i can accurately add more detail to my novel.”

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    Google doesn’t have the leverage to get it into your OS against your wishes. They can’t even make me have their apps (search, assistant) on their Android.

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    i guess it’s just puppeteer + ai prompting

    unless AI gets significantly better in the next year or so I doubt it’s gonna be any better than someone spending an hour writing a puppeteer scraping script

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    So why hasn’t anyone said much about Apple Intelligence? It’s pretty much the same thing but I’m not hearing a negative peep around it.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      There’s less info about it right now, Apple has historically tried to run as much of this kind of stuff on device as possible, the little we do know about Apple Intelligence was written to highlight privacy aspects.

      Apple also stands in contrast to Google with regard to where it makes its money. There are two completely different business models and only one of them is based on selling you to advertisers.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        “Even if you are paying, it doesn’t mean you are not a product”

        - Cory Doctrow

      • x_pikl_x@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Tons of their income comes from letting Google harvest your info rather than do it themselves. Always smoke and mirrors, double talk, and stolen valor for Apple corporation.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          A small amount of Apple’s annual revenue comes from shipping iPhones with Google as the default search engine on Safari, nothing more.

      • bokherif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The data collection happens on both ends. Apple only lies that it is about privacy and whatnot. Gives you a false sense of safety.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If you are going to claim that Apple is just as bad on privacy as the world’s largest advertising platform you’d better have some receipts.

          • bokherif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I heavily use both platforms, whatever I talk about or wherever I go, I see targeted ads. When I speak about brand X, I immediately see ads for it both in ios and android. Plus every device mic is being listened to all the time, advertising agencies are your proof. Sure android devices collect more data in practice, however the data that’s not being collected by ios can be inferred from the data that’s already been collected. Do you really believe a company when they say their devices are made to ensure your privacy? Google literally says the same thing on their privacy policies ;) it’s all legal mumbo jumbo that doesn’t mean what it’s supposed to.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I assume because a lot less people use Apple products. So many (myself included) do not care one bit what Apple does.