• tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’ve used them about a year and glad to see this kind of improvement. They are not perfect but still much better than the free options so far.

    Only concern I’ve had has been around the AI stuff they are providing… So far it’s optional and a separate piece from the normal search. Time will tell there I suppose.

    • NekuSoulA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 hours ago

      At the very least their AI Integration Philosophy has a good and nuanced view on the topic. So as long as they actually stick to that those ideas when integrating features it should be fine.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Does anyone still think their data isn’t being sold even if they pay for a service? Plus now it’s associated to your payment information. These are the same guys that spent all their runway funding on Tshirts, I don’t think they’re the sharpest knives in the drawer.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m not fathoming what Privacy Pass gains you, it’s tokens generated from your account, the chain of possession is obvious throughout. The tokens get used up and removed from your account and the logged-in browser extension generates more, but there’s no “privacy” involved there.

        Fair enough on the crypto.

        • theblips@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The tokens can’t be traced to the account and are batch generated so you can’t be deanonymized by correlation. They aren’t stored in the account, but locally, in fact Kagi can (and they say they will) just sell the tokens directly, as they aren’t linked at all to an account

    • MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m not a spy or part of the government, but Yandex is Russian… I tried them like 10 years ago, but I wouldn’t take my chances with them.

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There is a free trial and there was 1 month for free 2 months ago. You can try it and see if you think its worth the price

      I tried it and i personally believe its not worth the price, but testing it is better than just refusing the concept from the start

      • arakhis_@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        freemium pls :cry:

        although good freemium examples like proton mail for example seem too good to be true with free vpn and all the jazz. always such a shady feeling when using such services

        • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They have a trial for 100 searches iirc. And they also occasionally share referral links to subscribers that are 3 month premium subs to share with friends so they can try

      • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That’s only when doing business with corporations, but there’s also the option of open source (e.g. SearxNG).

        Or do you consider yourself the product when using Lemmy?

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Do you think Lemmy is free? Your admin is paying, and trusting you to donate to help out.

          • Muyal_Hix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            45 minutes ago

            Ironic considering the pinned post on .world is the admins asking for donations and pretty much everyone is saying “no”

          • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Uh, what a weird message. It’s not only unrelated to what I said but it reads like an attempt to twist my words. On top of it, it’s totally wrong: Lemmy is free. I can self host Lemmy on a raspberry pi for exactly 0€.

            The instance I use… Is also free. I donate because I choose to, but if my friend can’t afford to donate they can still use the instance. Nobody is profiting from it.

            What I did talk about is products and doing business with corporations. With Lemmy there’s no product, whether you pay or not. With SearxNG (which many people self host, and again, is free) you’re not the product, regardless of how much you pay.

            That’s what I was replying to - your comment is way off the mark and very condescending: I don’t need to be mansplained that I should donate to the software I already donate to. Note donate rather than pay for.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Lemmy is free. I can self host Lemmy on a raspberry pi for exactly 0€.

              Dang, where can I get a free Raspberry Pi and internet connection? That sounds awesome!

              The instance I use… Is also free. I donate because I choose to, but if my friend can’t afford to donate they can still use the instance. Nobody is profiting from it.

              This is exactly my point. It’s like when people call it “free healthcare”.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Fine for you. I’m just glad there’s an option besides “sell your soul” and “invest hundreds of hours and dollars into self-hosting”.

    • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Upvoted.

      I have a counterpoint to those claiming that paid are better. By using a privacy oriented search engine, then they don’t know exactly who you are. In theory just your IP. Maybe fingerprinting.

      When paying they know exactly who you are. You have to trust them.

      So in one case you can protect yourself, in the other you have to trust them.

      Also, Kagi also uses the Russian index Yandex 😑

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago
          1. Log into browser extension with kagi account

          2. generate tokens

          3. use said tokens

          How does this ensure privacy? The tokens are associated to your account from the start.

          • kibiz0r@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            There’s a link in the second paragraph to the technical details, including source code for the implementation and documentarion for the required infrastructure.

            But the tl;dr is that the tokens aren’t associated to your account. Unless you were able to snoop on the original request that generated the tokens (in which case, you’ve got bigger issues!), there’s no way to prove that a token is related to a specific account. A token only proves that an authorization server once granted access to some account.

            Edit: Wikipedia has a good intro:

            Non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs are cryptographic primitives, where information between a prover and a verifier can be authenticated by the prover, without revealing any of the specific information beyond the validity of the statement itself.