• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Literally every software company built their business model this way. Go open a support case with any software vendor complaining that their product won’t run on Windows 98 and see how many help you out beyond “Buy a computer from this millennium”

    No, they didn’t. I can install the software I bought back in the day on the computers I bought it for, using the license key provided. GoG also famously uses a model where GoG does not care what OS you’re using.

    You are failing to understand just how much has changed since Windows 98. It’s a completely different environment that requires specialized knowledge to develop for. They can’t just dust off some old source code and re-release the client. The entire back-end has changed. It would be a massive undertaking that would appease about 12 people total.

    Lol, I’m a software developer that started by writing legacy windows software, I know exactly how much (little) has changed.

    Sure, but I would argue that there are a lot of better things that Valve could be doing with those resources than supporting Windows 98

    I don’t care. They have the resources to support it.

    Either strip the DRM out and pay whatever you have to to the publishers to do that, or keep supporting the systems you sold your software for.

    The idea that Valve is blameless for shitty behaviour because other tech companies also do that shitty behaviour is nonsense. They have been the dominant platform forever, and have had an insane amount of resources available to them.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Lol, I’m a software developer that started by writing legacy windows software, I know exactly how much (little) has changed.

      Oh, so this whole situation is to a significant degree, your fault.

      =P

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Lol, I’m a software developer that started by writing legacy windows software, I know exactly how much (little) has changed.

      It is this perspective that exposes your bias and colors your perception.

      We live in a post-Heartbleed world. We live in a post-UAC world. We constantly find new bugs and vulnerabilities, and they cannot always be patched without massive changes to the architecture. We cannot forever maintain old systems that cultivated bad habits in it’s users.

      Not all change is good, but all change is inevitable.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        No that perspective is what makes me understand that when corporations talk about obsceleting things for security reasons, it’s almost always not actually because of security, because it would be a little less profitable to continue support.

        And Valve didnt have to build a business around always checking in DRM if they didn’t want to support old clients, and they have more than enough resources to continue support.

        • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Can I hold you to the decisions you made 20 years ago? I bought that program you built decades ago, that means I’m entitled to your continued support. And don’t you even think about getting paid, your support should be free. You shouldn’t have built and sold the software if you can’t support it…

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      GoG also famously uses a model where GoG does not care what OS you’re using.

      I could have sworn their model was keeping old games updated to work functionally on newer hardware.

      https://www.gog.com/en/gog-preservation-program

      The GOG Preservation Program ensures classic games remain playable on modern systems, even after their developers stopped supporting them. By maintaining these iconic titles, GOG helps you protect and relive the memories that shaped you, DRM-free and with dedicated tech support.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Yes, and thats literally completely irrelevant.

        The fact that their games are DRM free means that doesn’t matter one iota. If you buy a game from them on a set of hardware you’ll be able to play it on that hardware forever, regardless of whether their desktop client changes.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          But if they keep it updated for modern systems that means as time goes on the files they are offering to install… won’t work on old hardware because they’ve been updated to the modern era.

          Sure if you grab a file from them and never get a newer, more maintained version, it will play on exactly the hardware and software you had when you bought it… But if you lost the install file somehow and went to grab a new copy five years later the updated ones may no longer run on your old hardware

          • masterspace@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Sure if you grab a file from them snd never get a newer, more maintained version, it will play on exactly the hardware and software you had when you bought it…

            That’s literally the entire point.

            Also, they can still offer the olde versions of the file for download.