• Coyote_sly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Feels like we’ve hit the point of diminishing returns where the console cycle stops making sense. Does anyone really expect to ever play a PS6 game they just flat out couldn’t make at all on the PS5?

  • Aielman15@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Are we already talking about next gen leaks? Damn, this generation passed by and I barely noticed it.

    • tane69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That’s because there are barely any fucking games this gen it feels like

      • AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        So many resources wasted on live service projects that got canceled or flopped, that’s why

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah, I’ve been watching from the sidelines and still haven’t seen anything that moves the needle sufficiently.

        Where are the games?!

            • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I take this as a comparison sometimes. Also the PS2 got five GTAs, Liberty City Stories and Vice City Stories were released on PS2 too. The PS3 and Xbox 360 got two GTAs, and everything after got remasters. PS5 will probably get GTA 6, so GTA skipped the PS4/Xbox One generation.

            • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 hours ago

              There have been some great games with development times that long. But for crying out loud, if you’re not making a surefire success, make a smaller game so it’s less risky.

              • Flamekebab@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                16 hours ago

                There have been some great games with development times that long.

                Can you name some? I don’t mean to be derisive, I just literally can’t think of any right now.

                • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  I’m playing Kingdom Come: Deliverance II right now, and it’s excellent. Baldur’s Gate 3 took 6 years, though they attribute a good portion of that to an Eastern European war and a pandemic. Given other side projects, it’s a bit nebulous exactly how long Indiana Jones and Great Circle took that team to make, but it was somewhere between 5 and 7 years, and I loved it. I’m not exactly a fan of Nintendo lately, but people sure do love Donkey Kong Bananza, and that team had been working on that game more or less since Mario Odyssey’s release in 2017.

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They just ported all the PS4 games and slap PS5 on them. I bought a PS5 and not single game I have on it you can’t also buy a 4 version. Except for Dead Island 2, and it was meh. I have not used my PS5 in over a year it just collects dust. With PC games I get all I need and more. But I have looked at new games for it and not impressed with the lineup.

        • tane69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          It really does feel like this. And most of the new “ps5” games they also make for 4! Off the top of my head I can think of demons souls, ff16, ff7r part 2, and death stranding 2 were ps5 only and 3 of those are only timed exclusives

          • cannon_annon88@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            37 minutes ago

            It’s because half the player base still only has the PS4, like myself. I just could never justify spending that much money on a console that can only hold like 8 games Anyways without paying a crazy amount for extra storage, when I can still play the same games on the console I already have. I was more than happy to spend twice the money building a decent desktop where I can play just about anything I want with way more freedom.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I don’t think that’s a bad thing, though. It’s not like I’d be bothered if someone with a GPU 5 years older than mine is able to play the same game on PC.

            This is what consoles just should be. No longer locking games to specific generations, letting newer hardware run older titles better, and letting developers continue developing for lower hardware targets to include more people.

        • telllos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yeah, my ps5 is a netflix machine, and my son plays apex on it. I barely bought any games.

            • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Ahh, that’s a bummer. Hopefully she’s not too onerous about it. Some people don’t understand games as a hobby or down time activity but then are fine with tv/movies/books.

              • Mad__vegan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Nah. She’s right lol. Last month my PlayStation stats said I played 12 titles for 39 hours. So plenty of gaming to be had. The issue is that I’m addicted to humble bundles and have over 100 games there I’ve never played…

                • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Lol humble bundles are a fantastic way to build up a backlog. I have a pretty thick collection waiting to be played as well.

      • chewables@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        if you’re not really there for it then sure, but i got a ps5 for ff7 remake, kh3 and ff16 and i personally think I got my money’s worth. loved every goddamn second.

        it helped that I got p5r and expedition 33 as well, what a beaut of a bonus they were

        • vividspecter@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          They might mean exclusives, of which none of those apply. But I personally don’t think exclusives are a good thing anyway.

          • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            FF7 Remake, Rebirth and FF16 were timed exclusives, though all have since left and Square Enix said “never again, it wasn’t profitable enough.”

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Part of the “problem” is that the current gen launched basically at the height of COVID. People were distracted when it came out and studios took a huge productivity hit at a time when they would be pushing to get those games out.

      But it is coming up on 5 years and console generations tend to be 6-8 years if memory serves. Considering how much work goes into prepping the hardware, it makes sense to see “leaks” now for what will likely hit shelves in the fall of 2027 or 2028.

      But I think the bigger issue is that we kind of all know these are “just” computers and most games are multiplatform. Combine that with backwards compatibility and there really aren’t that many distinguishing games of a generation. Which is why it is a common refrain that this is probably the last “console generation” with the future being closer to PCs where you just have new hardware every few years and upgrade when a game you want needs it or you get bored.

      • Aielman15@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I am. I grew up with the PS1 and I really liked the simplicity, ease of use, affordability and reliability of older gens, but the newer ones seem to have all the cons of consoles and none of the benefits.

        • Evil Edgelord@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I grew up with cartridges, so this is hilarious to me. With PS1, you had to put in a disc, close the lid, press the power button, wait for the logo startup sequence, then your game would start (assuming there’s not some kind of problem that kicks you back to the disc/memory card screen). Don’t even get me started on disc damage 😂

          Now I’m a PC gamer with a humongous digital collection. Nothing gets damaged, and I get to keep all my games.

          One double-click, and I’m gaming.

          • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            So long as gaben is there at least. I hate to think how badly valve will fall once he’s no longer there.

        • troed@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Same here, although even earlier. As a family of five Sony’s horribly bad game sharing within the family if you have more than one PS5 (we do) has sealed the deal for us. I’ve just built up two Bazzite-based Steamboxes and that’s going to be our couchgaming from now on.

          No PS6.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Same. At least for me part of the problem is that I got a PS5 two years after release because I couldn’t get one, I’m not going to pay scalpers.

  • dwev@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    After SCE increased their prices in EU and Aus to help offset the US tariffs, I doubt I’ll invest anything into the PS ecosystem any more. I’d rather redirect into PC gaming from here.

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    If this is true I’m definitely out. I am barely playing anything technically demanding on the hardware. Mostly older or indie games. The Steam Deck has proven that handheld PC couch gaming is more than enough for me.

    Come to think of it, I didn’t even had to buy the PS5. It just catches dust and unlike the PS4 I didn’t get anything like Bloodborne aka something I could pump countless hundreds of hours in to justify buying it.

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I got the PS5 for my GF to play Hogwarts Legacy. I myself have played AstroBot, FF7, FF16 and Expedition33.

    I use the controller on my Mac playing PS1 and PS2 games though. That controller has seen more PS2 games than PS5 games lol

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They could probably get away with a PS6 that’s a PS5 Pro raster equivalent, improved ray tracing, and a modern AMD CPU and a bump in memory. Whatever can be sold for $500 in 2-3 years. Switch 2 is the baseline.

    Microsoft can be twice as powerful, unless they had a multi year string of incredible exclusives, they’re not doing better than this gen and
    regardless they don’t do exclusives anymore

    • Ashtear@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Improved ray tracing is key. We’re at a point where hardware improvements aren’t for selling games to end users, they’re for cutting costs for developers. Project managers don’t want to spend time and resources handcrafting lighting anymore.

      We saw it before where making SSDs baseline didn’t necessarily always lead to a change in world design but certainly led to cuts in asset streaming optimization. Same with framerates.

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t see how this thing possibly competes with a handheld PC. It’ll play the same games approximately just as well but with a tiny fraction of the library, and unless something changes, online play won’t even be free.

    • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      The handheld PC and things like SteamOS have crossed the moat that console games used to have as a defense. The PC is coming to the living room, attaching to your TV, and playing games controller-first. The question will be how well will those games play and will they be exclusive.

      The other defense, exclusive games, consoles themselves have given up. PlayStation has been publishing to PC to make up revenues thinking that it’s safe because it’s not their competitor Xbox, and Xbox bet on gamepass (and has now lost the console almost entirely, hoping to make its money back via Windows licensure).

    • simple@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The Vita had a shared library system where if you get the handheld version for free if you owned the PS4 version of games. I imagine they could do something similar to keep playstation users interested

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That’s surely what they’re planning, especially since the architecture won’t be very different this time around, but that still pales in comparison to the value you’d get from a PC handheld for what will likely be an extremely similar price.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Some weird views in the article. Like comparing it to the price of the ps5 pro and will be lower. Of course it will be. It has to be since the price point of the average consumer will never buy it at that price. They need to get it back down to the $400-$500 range for it to work. Also saying the ps4 cutback on hardware compared to the ps3 may be true but it wasnt noticeable either. The jump between both consoles was huge and didnt seem like anything was sacrificed. That won’t be the case here since i doubt anyone will even notice the difference because games aren’t getting that much better looking anymore. They need to start focusing on features and other advantages to establish itself as a better option to having a PC.